Search found 121 matches

by juLiE
Fri May 20, 2005 14:49
Forum: General Chat
Topic: copyright issues
Replies: 14
Views: 10221

Originally posted by NexusIntent I don't know how the law is in europe, as I am in the USa, but I was wondering if anyone has come across any copyright issues while performing video at a show? i'm from the USA too and here's a link to "fair use": http://fairuse.stanford.edu/Copyright_and_Fair_Use_O...
by juLiE
Thu May 19, 2005 14:32
Forum: General Chat
Topic: proces resolution & other quality questions.
Replies: 13
Views: 7833

Originally posted by Anonymous
bonjour DoofBoy
was really posted by me juLiE
by juLiE
Wed May 18, 2005 20:41
Forum: General Chat
Topic: proces resolution & other quality questions.
Replies: 13
Views: 7833

thanx for posting Ruud i am using the same codec (indeo 5.2). when i had posted this, i forgot *not* to deinterlace again (since i had done this in the first compression). also i was *not* using "bicubic" (had it set to "nearest neighbor"), but then changed to that. the 2 observations above helped o...
by juLiE
Fri May 13, 2005 21:34
Forum: General Chat
Topic: proces resolution & other quality questions.
Replies: 13
Views: 7833

Originally posted by seex_ I have a whole lot of clips in 320x240, since i bought a new comp i render all to 640x480 this is also the size of my output monitor. instead of starting a new thread, i'll post here: i have lots of 720x480 avi indeo 5.2 compressed footage that i want to re-scale down to ...
by juLiE
Fri May 13, 2005 02:35
Forum: Problems? Bugs? Solutions!
Topic: Cursed!! - Weekly Builds?
Replies: 16
Views: 13092

Originally posted by bart ...But your output resolution can be 800x600 without any negative impact on the speed because the final scaling is done with trilinear scaling by the videocard. i know this is an old post, but when i searched on the entire forum for "trilinear" (various spellings), this wa...
by juLiE
Wed May 11, 2005 14:46
Forum: General Chat
Topic: HUGE PROPS on 2.2
Replies: 7
Views: 4362

ahhhh, ok, thanx very much Bart, gotcha all the way :) yes, i love the 3 layers/effects and do use 'em, however i've experimented w/different processs/output resolutions and found ones (higher) that work on my pc (shuttle is rather decent/fast)...but yeah a raid 0 would be nice too (to: anonymous). ...
by juLiE
Tue May 10, 2005 23:22
Forum: General Chat
Topic: HUGE PROPS on 2.2
Replies: 7
Views: 4362

Originally posted by mfo

Btw. 640x480 is a veritable resolution for me too - as long as i work with video clips only.
do you know why resolume recommends 400x300 for rendered/output process?
by juLiE
Mon May 09, 2005 20:28
Forum: General Chat
Topic: HUGE PROPS on 2.2
Replies: 7
Views: 4362

Originally posted by NexusIntent all processing done at 640x480 on both machines - don't know why some people still only push 400x300 as i have no problems with 640x480 yes, i would like to know why too. actually why is it recommend by resolume to render/output-process at 400x300? why this specific...
by juLiE
Mon May 09, 2005 20:09
Forum: General Chat
Topic: resolution
Replies: 11
Views: 7989

de rien! bitte! you're welcome :)
by juLiE
Mon May 09, 2005 19:43
Forum: General Chat
Topic: resolution
Replies: 11
Views: 7989

Originally posted by Sense We use 400x300 processing, output 640x480 (manual) not in the preselect possible in windows XP. You gain some frames and output looks great. With CTRL-ALT-I (Resolume processing information *don't forget turning it off, going live*) You can see the FPS. Cheerz, nz|sense t...