this is actualy a pretty reasonable statement. some things should cost a little more, otherwise too many people give them away for little / nothing, which in the end does nobody any good.goto10 wrote:I may be going out on a limb here, but if you're doing such advanced mapping that you require these additional tools, but can't afford the additional costs in one or two shows, maybe you should talk to the promotor again. You're pulling of something that very few people understand how to do, and that is something that should be rewarded.
I couldn't agree more with what you's are saying. - think of how many mapping gigs your getting and you'll realise that for every job you work Arena will cost X amount. If i take into consideration how much i paid for res 3 when it came out and how much I've used it im laughing. it works out some at some crazy price and dare i say cheap. I look at Resolume as an investment. to me its essentially an instrument.VJair wrote:this is actualy a pretty reasonable statement. some things should cost a little more, otherwise too many people give them away for little / nothing, which in the end does nobody any good.goto10 wrote:I may be going out on a limb here, but if you're doing such advanced mapping that you require these additional tools, but can't afford the additional costs in one or two shows, maybe you should talk to the promotor again. You're pulling of something that very few people understand how to do, and that is something that should be rewarded.
if you need it, you will pay for it ( that stands for both promoters and performers )
Oh. I've to admit that I feel a bit disappointed about it.goto10 wrote: I'm afraid I can actually be short about your list, because none of these feature requests have made it into R4. It's not that we think they're bad ideas (we've actually done quite a bit of work on copying properties), they just weren't a priority for this release.