blending mode since 2.3

Post your questions here and we'll all try to help.
Post Reply
User avatar
eubé
Met Resolume in a bar the other day
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:51
Location: Paris, Bangkok, Caracas

blending mode since 2.3

Post by eubé »

hey VJ ppl !

I used to play with 2.3, loved it ! then I started playing with 3 & 4 every now and then , great soft, only for my needs there was one thing missing wich is timeline audiosync but I came out with this

but after a while I think I saw something else I can't do anything about, I have the feeling that at list if not all, the "difference" mode (wich I use often) in 3 & 4 results differently that in 2.3 with same sequences overlaying&no effects...

am I hallucinating ?

cheers

User avatar
eubé
Met Resolume in a bar the other day
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:51
Location: Paris, Bangkok, Caracas

Re: blending mode since 2.3

Post by eubé »

little update, here some screenshots I just made actually
r2.3.png
r4.png


:o :o :o :o :o :o :o

so what happened ? I would be very curious to know :)

in my opinion 2.3 has more this weird digital looking wick I like more ... so I'm gona stick with it !

HerrNieDa
Is seriously in love with Resolume. Met the parents and everything
Posts: 465
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2008 09:30

Re: blending mode since 2.3

Post by HerrNieDa »

have you tried "Difference I" at 50%?
MainSys: Z77 UP5,3570K,32GB Ram,GTX 285, M3 128GB,4x3TB R5@LSI9750
VJSys 1: 990FX UD5,X6 1045T,16GB Ram,GTX970+610+610,M3 128GB,3x1TB R0
MBP 3.1; Schenker A102 (650m) & P702 (675m)

User avatar
eubé
Met Resolume in a bar the other day
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:51
Location: Paris, Bangkok, Caracas

Re: blending mode since 2.3

Post by eubé »

it is "differenceI" at 50%,

and with "difference" (not Inverted) mode it's not at all the same result

User avatar
eubé
Met Resolume in a bar the other day
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:51
Location: Paris, Bangkok, Caracas

Re: blending mode since 2.3

Post by eubé »

hey !

I re post in hope to et an answer from the dev team :)

is this 'bug' on purpose ? or due to new source code rendering differently ?

and would it be possible easily to go back to 2.3 looks or you think new look is best ? :)

Post Reply