Page 1 of 1

Simple Question: FX vs. Performance

Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2019 17:18
by pfelberg
Curious...
I have 05 layers. All pre loaded with 10 bypassed effects each, which are activated whenever needed.

Concerning performance, is there a difference between a bypassed effect and an active effect with opacity level at zero?
I wish to keep ALL effects active but with zero opacity, adjusting levels using Dashboard usage combinations for the selected layer.
Is this a performance issue?

Thanks

Paulo

Re: Simple Question: FX vs. Performance

Posted: Sun Jun 30, 2019 05:17
by PERCYJOSEPH
The same information I too like to know.
+1

Re: Simple Question: FX vs. Performance

Posted: Sun Jun 30, 2019 21:15
by cosmowe
Hey there, I asked the same question a while a go. And the answer was:

Bypassed FX and FX with zero opas = No resources are used.


Best wishes
cosmowe

Re: Simple Question: FX vs. Performance

Posted: Mon Jul 01, 2019 02:46
by pfelberg
Thanks. Cheers!!