Page 1 of 1

VJ : Video jockey or Visual jockey?

Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2007 16:27
by erland
i'm confuse..
i want to named my self as a man who play a visualization..
what should i called my self??

VJ : Video Jockey?
or..
VJ : Visual Jockey?

Video : is a moving frames.
Visual : everything, including pictures..
So, in this case, picture is not a moving frame.. a visualization contains all about films (still frame and moving frames).. but in the end, a moving frames is made by still frames...hehe

Get my point of view?

My opinion is.. we should call ourselves :
VsJ : Visual Jockey... shouldn't?
In Resolume we play not only video.. but also picture and flash files..

Still Complicated somehow...

Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 21:09
by olim
I prefer Video Jammer! :cool:

cheers.

Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 15:31
by Basic
video artist. sounds a bit better for me and i think people understand it a bit better also. :D

Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 12:23
by bart
Because the term VJ has always been confused with MTV VJs people have always been searching for a different & better name but VJ (for Video Jockey) is still the most used. CDM is trying to push the name Visualist but i find that very hard to pronounce more then 5 times ;-)

http://createdigitalmotion.com/2007/01/ ... isualists/