bart wrote: I,ve also rendered the file to h264 and photo jpeg...
hi there - i did a test with indeo 5.2 and DXV. the DXV is darker than the indeo, *but* it's exactly the same as one sees it in the adobe premiere preview monitor - where as the indeo appears too bright then (hopefully this makes sense...and maybe it's totally irrelevant).
the thing that i noticed and that i'm wondering about regarding the DXV codec is that the pixels are more defined, evident/harsh where as the indeo pixels are more obscure, blurred/smoothed...and for me, indeo's easier on my eyes where as with DXV, my attention is drawn to the pixels of the image from time to time...just my point of view, not a criticism.
[both of these videos were made with deinterlace checked. also, one can see the pixels with your orange_string videos too - see all 3 images below with circles defining soft & defined pixelations.]
2013 - Present: Dell Inspiron 7720 laptop, Win 7 sp1, Nividia GeForce GT 650M
2008 - 2012: Dell Vostro 1700 laptop, Win XP sp3, Nividia GeForce 8600M GT
2004 - 2008: Mini PC ITX...
Official Website:
http://www.juliemeitz.com