resolume VS flowmotion

pifco · Post by **pifco** » Thu Dec 23, 2004 12:18

for me it was a simple choice.
beauty over speed.

Resolume just seems to have many more things which make people go:
"what the hell was that?"
and that suits me fine.

pif

cameronch · Post by **cameronch** » Tue Dec 28, 2004 22:27

great product edwin.
--------------------------
features over performance is the way to go I think. The lack of midi settings save/backup is a pain for me, but backing up the 2 files is a temp solution.

I love this program - the programs listed above just done 'feel' as good.

Post by **edwin** » Wed Dec 29, 2004 11:08

hi cameronch,
thanx for the compliment.

we will find a solution for the midi/settings.
its a high priority because a lot of people are asking this.

Cheers
Edwin

gradek · Post by **gradek** » Mon May 21, 2007 05:38

I have used both flowmotion an resolume, It was a hard choice, but I went with resolume for my needs. easy user interface, and simple blending modes are what I wanted. I would however agree with the need for resolume to have a load into ram feature. to speed clips up. as apposed to using a third party program like ramdisk. also, dual processor support would be nice. my mac book pro only hits 50% cpu usage with resolume.

--Martin

Basic · Post by **Basic** » Mon May 21, 2007 15:04

does dual processors have hyperthreading or that was that just for the single cpu?

tried flowmotion, cant use it when you drunk and i feel that resolume is has endless possibilities. kind of like photoshop in that sense. its what you do with it!

Resolume over all

gradek · Post by **gradek** » Tue May 22, 2007 07:35

Drunken Vjing... sounds like a it might work, and be a good time. My dual processors are Dual-Core Intel Core Duo that came with the second model of the MBP.

--Martin