here are some finds.
R5.0 / Win7
1. Save Name
- Open an existing composition
- Watch in the upper left where the comp name and resolution is shown.
- Composition > Save As..
- Type "MILF" in the "Name" field.
- Don't press "Save" just close the -save as- window with the [X]
- Watch to the upper left again...there is a MILF!
- Restart Resolume again... the MILF is gone.
2. Column delete jump'n run
- Create a comp with 2 layers and place 40 clips in each layer but a minimum of 41 columns
- Scroll to the empty column 41 and delete it via right click "remove" on the columnfield.
- Your clipdeck scrollbar stays in position.
- Now playback any clip in column 40.
- Delete column 40 via right click "remove" on the columnfield.
- The scollbar jumps back to column 1 instead of staying in position and C1 L1 is highlighted
It's a bit annoying when you clean up your decks.
3. Output 42
Hitting on "Output" in Resolume it shows me under -windowed- and -fullscreen- my outputs which are plugged to a playback device. In my case it shows me Output 13 & Output 14.
Where do these numbers come from?
Shouldn't they named the same way windows gave them their ID's...1 & 2?
This way I have a chance to identify them better before I click on Fullscreen > Display.
And btw...whats the reason for deleting the resolution behind the displays? It was very convenient.
4. Advanced output focus
Mentioned before I guess.
- Open the advanced output.
- Open the PDF with the pixel-mapping from the LED company.
- Close or minimize the advanced output to read the PDF because there is no way to bring it to front.
5. Windows 10 convenient scaling - not
- Plug a projector into your Win10 system with a native resolution lower than the supported resolution.
(In my case its an Epson projector with natively 1280x720px but it can process 1920x1080px)
- Make sure its set to the max. supported resolution (in my case 1920x1080) and set it to extended mode via the windows display configuration menu.
- Open Resolume with a blank composition
- Open the advanced output
- Click on Screen 1
- Open the Screen 1 device tab and have a look onto the resolution of your extended display.
- In my case its shown up with 1536x864px
If its shown up correctly in your case you are lucky. In the Windows Display configuration menu right above the -orientation- drop down you are able to set Font, App and other element scaling... Win 10 set this automatically for you when you plug in a new projector/display for the first time... especially if its a device with a lower native resolution then the supported one.
If you where lucky and win10 set it to 100% automatically you can force my issue if you set the scaling to 125% ..accept...relogin to Win10 and reopen Resolume 5. Now your resolution should also be displayed wrong.
On my last job with a quite fiddly LED mapping I went crasy since I found the reason for what's going on. I guess the displayed resolution in the Resolume screen device tap is a base value for everything in Resolume which has something to do with scaling.... so everything was scaled wrong after I was plugged into the LED controller.
Setting the Windows "App" scaling to 100% solved my problem.
6. Everything snaps to everything

Youtube TC Link
- Open Resolume R5
- Open the advanced output
- Create two slices each for example 200x200px
- Place them dirty beside each other in the input configuration.
- Go to the output transformation tab and hit "match input shape" for each of them.
- Place them side by side with a big gab between them.
- Select the left slice and catch the outer selection area of the upper right point.
- Try to snap it anywhere to the right slice.
- Nope

Why can only polygons snap? Its very useful for slices too. For example when you are going to map something onto a simple cube. Here you just have to map your first slice proper to the surface and let the rest snap to the first proper slice.
I tried to map something with the polygon tool onto a 45° rotated cube on my table. But no chance...When I place all 4 points of my 4 point polygon on one side of the cube correctly..there's a visible optical distortion along the inner legs of the triangles. Or do I miss here something?
sooo..after a lot of text I really hope it's useful for anybody.
Best wishes
cosmowe