Uhm, hi...
I've just been working with the Resolume demo for a couple of days now, after finally getting my new system up and running. There's been talk about new features at the forum here, so I thought I'd put in my 2 cents. Hopefully I'm not bringing up stuff that's already in there that I've missed...
1) As has been mentioned enhanced midi-support is always good.
2) Transfer modes. I'd REALLY love to be able to overlay stuff using screen or multiply modes like in Photoshop or After Effects.
3) Linking parameters to sound-input.
4) Displacement mapping?
5) T-shirts. We need Resolume T-shirts.
Rndll
new features?
1) We are working on midi to improve it!
2) you can already use screen and multiply..
what is it that you miss.. the ability to fade?
3) the question of sound parameters is something we are doing research at, we want to make a good formula to making resolume sound-enabled.. probably this will be implemented in version 2 and not in 1.1. so you will have to wait longer for that!
4) what?
5) T-shirts coming up, we already made an design , but we don't know if there is enough interest so we are not sure wether we should make them only for ourseleves or as well for anybody who wants them..
6) aspect ratio. so 16:9 widescreen and so on.., we already did a test with that once.. will see if we've got time left for that
thanx for the input.. we really like that.. as long as it is reasonable
greetz...
edwin
2) you can already use screen and multiply..
what is it that you miss.. the ability to fade?
3) the question of sound parameters is something we are doing research at, we want to make a good formula to making resolume sound-enabled.. probably this will be implemented in version 2 and not in 1.1. so you will have to wait longer for that!
4) what?
5) T-shirts coming up, we already made an design , but we don't know if there is enough interest so we are not sure wether we should make them only for ourseleves or as well for anybody who wants them..
6) aspect ratio. so 16:9 widescreen and so on.., we already did a test with that once.. will see if we've got time left for that

thanx for the input.. we really like that.. as long as it is reasonable
greetz...
edwin
Oh, I found the transparency thingies. I'll start reading the manual now, even though it's completely against my principles... 
Sorry about the technical term 'displacement mapping', it's a procedure that uses the luma values of one layer to displace the other layer. It's in After Effects and programms like that. I think Steim's I/magine has it. Not too urgent though, and I can wait for audio support.
I'm currently fooling around with types of compression and resolution, since I can't do with Cinepak compression, it's too ugly for my purposes.
It seems as if all the clips are taken from the hard-drives, would it be difficult to make clips load in RAM, or have the option to load certain clips in RAM? At current RAM prices this could be really enhancing the performance.
Anyway, after a short while I'm starting to get grips on the program, I'll need a midi controller soon though. Anyone got a spare Peavey PC 1600?
Keep up the terrific work, I'll probably order copy soon, but I'll want a T-shirt too!
Rndll

Sorry about the technical term 'displacement mapping', it's a procedure that uses the luma values of one layer to displace the other layer. It's in After Effects and programms like that. I think Steim's I/magine has it. Not too urgent though, and I can wait for audio support.
I'm currently fooling around with types of compression and resolution, since I can't do with Cinepak compression, it's too ugly for my purposes.
It seems as if all the clips are taken from the hard-drives, would it be difficult to make clips load in RAM, or have the option to load certain clips in RAM? At current RAM prices this could be really enhancing the performance.
Anyway, after a short while I'm starting to get grips on the program, I'll need a midi controller soon though. Anyone got a spare Peavey PC 1600?
Keep up the terrific work, I'll probably order copy soon, but I'll want a T-shirt too!
Rndll
yes cinepak is too ugly but it make a big slow down if we use something other you know certainly one of your concurrent : visual jockey.... with only a software engine they haves a great quality for the vids. but for the simplicity i prefer resolume...do something for the picture quality and you would have a software in gold.
-
- Posts: 295
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 18:24
- Location: Glasgow